lived out

my faith journey

Tag Archives: fwb

Church multiplication among Free Will Baptists: I have an idea

Why can’t Free Will Baptists plant 100 churches in the next 10 years?

I asked this question recently via twitter at the fwb21 panel in Memphis. The question was mentioned by the moderator, but just as a statement. But I’m seriously asking it. Why can’t we? Actually, I know the answer. It’s because we don’t have a clear vision to do so. There is no plan in place for making it happen. Churches don’t plant themselves.

So the better question might be: How can Free Will Baptists plant 100 churches in the next 10 years?

Before I share my idea, there are three things you should know.

First, notice that I’m not asking how we can plant 100 FWB churches. No, the question is how can FWB plant 100 churches. The emphasis here is on how our denomination can advance God’s kingdom, not the other way around.

Second, I am thankful for the strong foundation FWB have. There are many solid areas on which to build. I’m not as interested on why we don’t have a vision for planting churches and why we aren’t reproducing. I’m more interested in discussing how we can move forward.

Third, this article and idea only pertains to churches in the United States. We continue to send out missionaries to foreign countries. The FWB churches in other countries are multiplying. Glory to God for that work. But how can we make it happen here?

How can FWB plant 100 churches in the next 10 years?

Our churches must be willing to plant churches. This requires a shift in current ideology. Right now, we go to churches to raise monies, and churches support four, five, or twelve missionaries, both domestic and foreign. Instead of thinking support, we need to think multiplication. A healthy church should have it in their DNA to plant another church. They should be training a pastor and a group of people to go and plant a church in another neighborhood or another city.

If 100 churches determined to do this, it would happen. The problem is that we need a place to start. So here we go.

Hire Ed Stetzer (or another church planting guru) to invest in the lives of 10 pastors. Maybe this is a weekend retreat or a few months of virtual training. The goal is that those pastors will come away equipped to lead their church to plant a church. They will understand what it takes to train, equip, and fund a church plant. They will be knowledgeable about different church planting models. These pastors will not only lead their church to plant one church, but to continue to reproduce and plant many healthy churches over the years.

So how do we get to 100 churches in 10 years?

Repeat the above step. Continue to train pastors and church leadership on how to plant other churches, not just write checks for church planters.

This is different. I get it. But we need something different, because what we’re doing now is not effective. Should it really take a FWB church in the United States 11 years to become self-supporting? Should FWB only be planting a few new churches a year? If we want to help God’s kingdom grow, then we have to challenge and change the status quo.

But what about the Home Missions department?

I pray Home Missions would bring in someone who has been successful at church planting and train them to become more effective. But what if they don’t? Should we continue to watch churches close and numbers decline while continuing in the same path? I’m not a church planting expert, but don’t expect FWB to be a part of a massive growth for God’s kingdom if we aren’t willing to change what we’re doing. The hard truth is that we haven’t expanded God’s kingdom in the United States in the last 50 years.

This isn’t just a pipe dream for me. I believe it is a way for us to be the kingdom growers God intends us to be. Where do we start? I think we should create a network of like-minded FWB who wish to see a church planting revolution in our denomination. That network should create a plan of action, ask Home Missions if they would like to be a part, and continue regardless.

It’s time. Let’s go.

REACH for the Heavens! (by Daryl Ellis)

Reblogged from #grayfwb:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

REACH has five very broad objectives:

R – Revitalization of churches

E – Encourage church planting

A – Accept our uniqueness and diversity

C – Commit to unity and a graceful spirit

H – Highlight spiritual formation

What would happen if our denomination rallied around reaching these objectives together? What would our denomination look like if we realized each of these objectives?

Read more… 570 more words

A dream for Free Will Baptists

The danger of disunity (guest post by Logan Wolf)

Today’s post was written by Logan Wolf. Logan is the pastor of New Morning Church, a church plant in Provo, Utah. I met Logan via Twitter quite a while ago, and asked him to write a post because of his different perspective. Actually, from a glance, you would see that Logan and I probably would not choose to do many things (anything?) the same way in the church. Yet we both want to see the gospel go forward, so we collaborate the best we can. I enjoyed reading his post, and I think you will as well.

_____________________________

The Corinthian church was diverse, composed of both Gentiles and Jews. With diversity always comes the danger of disunity. From Paul’s letter to the Corinthians we know that is exactly what had happened. He writes in 1 Corinthians 1:10-13:

Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you. Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ. Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

Divisions and contentions, literally splits and quarrels, had arisen and were hindering the work of this church. These believers rallied around different men and, from what we know of these men, different styles of teaching and ministry. You can imagine Gentiles proudly labeling themselves Paulians or Apollonians, pointing to Paul’s authority as the founder of the church or emphasizing Apollos’ eloquence and speaking ability. Doubtlessly Jews gathered around the name of Cephas, or Peter, and Christ, Cephians pointing to long standing Jewish tradition and Christians boasting in the purity of their faith.

This labeling and classification, and the resulting splits and quarrels, is implicative of today. I’m conservative; I’m liberal; I graduated from Southeastern; I graduated from Free Will Baptist Bible College; I’m pro-International Missions department; I’m a local church missions guy; I’m KJV only; I use the ESV; and the list continues ad nuaseam. Designations and distinctions such as conservative, liberal, or even the title Free Will Baptist, may seem like the most important things in the world. The Corinthians certainly thought so. However, rather than give his stamp of approval to one group and elevate it above the rest, Paul emphasized the unity of Jesus and His headship.

It’s clear that these factions resulted from a failure to recognize Jesus as Lord, the ultimate authority and standard, in that Paul saw fit to emphasize that title 59 times throughout the letter. This too is implicative of today. Like seems to have been the case with the Corinthians, today preferences get more attention than is due them. As such, they overshadow the teaching of the church being Jesus’ unified body specifically and the authority of the Bible generally. A quote from Trevor McIlwain is extremely applicable here:

The majority of Christian teaching emphasizes individual doctrines of the Bible rather than presenting the Bible as one complete, interdependent revelation of God. Heresies, misinterpretation, overemphasis of certain Scriptures, and denominationalism can, in most cases, be traced to this lack of chronological and panoramic Bible teaching.

If I allow Jesus to be Lord and the Bible to be the standard and you do the same, then from what I see in Paul’s letter everything that divides us will begin to shift from the center of our focus to the periphery. Those things won’t disappear, but they won’t hinder us from working together as a unified whole for the cause of Christ.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,471 other followers